Fall arresters instead of rope clamps
Submitted by Miha Staut (not verified) on Fri, 22/06/2012 - 09:07.
What are the weak points of using fall arresters (EN 353-2) instead of rope clamps such as in professional applications? We all well know what are the results of rope clamp dynamic loading (sheath tearing results in loads between 5 kN and 6 kN depending on rope type and diameter). Fall arresters on the other hand are made with that purpose in mind and do not damage the rope so easily. It is true most of the falls will not have high fall factors an hence impact loads but what is the point in using devices that are specifically contraindicated for falls? Thanks for your answers.
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr> <br> <img> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <p> <span> <b> <i> <u>
More information about formatting options
Activities & techniques
Rope access and confined space
Energy and networks
Framing and roofing
Ski lift rescue
© Petzl 1996 - 2013